New York State Is Set to Raise Taxes on Those Earning Over $1 Million

The deal, a sign of Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s weakened influence, would mean wealthy New York City residents would pay the highest combined local tax rate in the nation.,


Continue reading the main story

Supported by

Continue reading the main story

Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo and New York State legislative leaders were nearing a budget agreement on Monday that would make New York City’s millionaires pay the highest personal income taxes in the nation, a stark result of the pandemic’s economic fallout.

For years, Mr. Cuomo resisted such a move, arguing that raising taxes, especially on the wealthy, would drive business out of state. But the coronavirus-related revenue shortfalls — combined with the growing strength of the Legislature’s progressive wing and the governor’s waning influence — created sudden momentum.

If enacted, the deal would raise income and corporate taxes to generate an extra $4.3 billion a year and would potentially legalize mobile sports betting to raise an additional $500 million in new tax revenue.

Under the proposed new tax rate, the city’s top earners could pay between 13.5 percent to 14.8 percent in state and city taxes, when combined with New York City’s top income tax rate of 3.88 percent — more than the top marginal income tax rate of 13.3 percent in California, currently the highest in the nation.

The question of who should pay to help revive the country, still recovering from the pandemic’s devastation of the economy, is percolating across the nation. In Washington, President Biden has proposed 15 years of substantial increases in corporate taxes to help pay for an eight-year, $2 trillion package of infrastructure spending.

The president is also expected to propose tax increases on high-earning individuals, a maneuver that many states are also weighing. Lawmakers in California are considering a wealth tax, while Minnesota’s governor has proposed a new top income tax rate in the state. In Washington State, the State Senate last month narrowly approved a new 7 percent tax on capital gains of more than $250,000, which Gov. Jay Inslee, a Democrat, has said he supports.

In New York, two new personal income tax brackets would be temporarily created: 10.3 percent for income between $5 million and $25 million, and 10.9 percent for income over $25 million, according to preliminary details obtained by The New York Times. The new rates would expire by the end of 2027.

The personal income tax rate would increase to 9.65 percent from 8.82 percent for individuals making over $1 million and for joint filers making more than $2 million.

Raising taxes on the rich in New York has been a top policy priority of the Democratic Party’s left flank, but Mr. Cuomo, a third-term Democrat who is a fiscal centrist, had long opposed the move. Now, the governor’s influence over the budget — as well as other matters in Albany — has seemed to weaken amid various investigations into sexual harassment allegations and his handling of virus-related deaths involving the state’s nursing homes.

Mr. Cuomo was in the awkward position of negotiating with Democratic leaders whose full support he has lost: Andrea Stewart-Cousins, the majority leader in the State Senate, has called on him to resign, while Carl E. Heastie, the speaker of the Assembly, has opened an impeachment investigation into the governor.

Democrats, who control the Legislature, entered this year’s negotiations emboldened by the governor’s apparent loss of power, eager to leverage the worst political crisis of Mr. Cuomo’s decade-long tenure to pass a bevy of progressive priorities. Democrats also have veto-proof supermajorities in both houses, increasing their clout.

Mr. Cuomo, who expressed some willingness earlier this year to increase taxes in a doomsday plan if Washington didn’t come through with sufficient federal funding, said on Monday that officials were close to finalizing a deal.

“We have a conceptual agreement on all issues, I think it is fair to say,” he said in a conference call with reporters. “We’re dotting some i’s, we’re crossing some t’s.”

Democrats in the Legislature had initially looked to raise more than $7 billion in new revenue, mostly through even higher tax increases on the rich, but the urgency to raise taxes diminished after Congress approved a stimulus package that gave the state $12.6 billion in direct aid. It was a huge one-time windfall supposed to help cover most of the $15 billion budget gap over the next two years, bailing out the state after the pandemic decimated tax revenues.

The business community has warned that raising income taxes could prompt millionaires who have left the state during the pandemic and are working remotely to make their move permanent, damaging the state’s tax base. Currently, the top 2 percent of the state’s highest earners pay about half of the state’s income taxes.

Nothing in Albany is ever final until the bills are printed, passed and signed, with last-minute lobbying efforts and political jockeying always threatening to create snags that could unravel or delay a deal. Still, Democratic lawmakers appeared on track to achieve many of their objectives.

The budget deal could pave the way for a casino in New York City, an idea long floated as a possible boon for the state’s tax revenues. Developers have salivated at the potential market in a city of nine million which once drew more than 50 million visitors a year. Language being circulated among lawmakers would allow the state to issue three casino licenses, almost certainly to be granted in the city and the suburbs, accelerating an expansion that had been scheduled to begin in 2023.

Other aspects of the budget, which was due on April 1, are still being negotiated, and could provide significant relief for New Yorkers still struggling from the fallout of the coronavirus pandemic, from assistance for small businesses to money for tenants late on rent and cash payments for undocumented immigrants who did not qualify for federal stimulus checks.

Indeed, this year’s budget negotiations — like last year’s — took place in the shadow of the pandemic, with many lawmakers working from home and most of the deals being formulated via video meetings even as the state reckoned with financial challenges related to the pandemic.

Even so, there appeared to be an agreement to use the revenue from the higher taxes on the rich to vastly increase education spending and implement a recovery grant program for small businesses that suffered losses during the pandemic.

The corporate franchise tax rate would also increase to 7.25 percent from 6.5 percent, but it is supposed to remain unchanged for small businesses. The proposed tax rate increases were reported in The Wall Street Journal.

For months, a statewide coalition of activists pushed for a slew of new taxes on the superrich, a top priority for the ascendant progressive wing in Albany. The activists pushed back against migration fears and framed higher taxes as essential to help support needy New Yorkers, especially after the pandemic.

“Thanks to thousands of New Yorkers who took to the streets and the ballot box, tireless advocates and grass-roots organizers, and the new Democratic legislative power in Albany, we are beginning to transform New York from a state that protects the wealthy to a state that delivers for the many,” said Rebecca Bailin, campaign manager for the Invest In Our New York Coalition, which includes unions, the Working Families Party and the Democratic Socialists of America.

Andrew Rein, the president of the Citizens Budget Commission, a fiscal watchdog, said the state had $22 billion more available over the next two years than officials anticipated in January, and called the proposed tax increases “unnecessary and economically risky” at a time when the economic recovery is fragile.

“Unfortunately, the state’s leaders chose not to leverage the opportunity provided by strengthening tax revenues and massive federal aid to stabilize New York’s fiscal picture and maintain its economic competitiveness,” Mr. Rein said.

Also being finalized was a $2.1 billion “excluded workers fund” for New Yorkers who did not qualify to receive federal stimulus checks and unemployment benefits during the pandemic for certain reasons, such as their immigration status. The fund would provide retroactive cash payments to those people, primarily undocumented workers who lost their jobs and people recently released from prisons.

ImageState lawmakers are still discussing the creation of an excluded workers fund for New Yorkers who do not qualify for federal stimulus checks and other benefits.
State lawmakers are still discussing the creation of an excluded workers fund for New Yorkers who do not qualify for federal stimulus checks and other benefits. Credit…Spencer Platt/Getty Images

Republicans in Albany, shunted to the minority, have denounced the new tax rates, as well as other proposals, including the excluded workers fund, which they said will give taxpayer dollars to undocumented immigrants.

“As New York families and businesses fight for their physical and economic well-being, Democrats are raising taxes and using your federal stimulus dollars to enact a radical agenda rather than helping veterans, small main street businesses, teachers and senior citizens,” said State Senator Rob Ortt, the Western New York Republican who serves as minority leader.

Democratic lawmakers have agreed on an extensive rent relief program to help vulnerable tenants who owe rent, an effort meant to aid not only renters who experienced financial hardship because of the pandemic and are at risk of eviction, but struggling landlords, too.

The program would help certain renters cover up to 12 months of money owed on rent and utilities, as well as three months of future rent. Tenants would be eligible, regardless of immigration status, if they meet certain benchmarks of financial hardship, such as being eligible for unemployment, or if they are considered low-income. Priority would also be given to veterans, domestic violence victims, small landlords and people facing eviction proceedings.

Much of the program will be funded by $2.3 billion in aid from the federal government, but the distribution of that relief largely depends on how the state sets up the program. Democratic lawmakers and tenant groups were particularly concerned that many tenants could be shut out if the application process was too complex or proving eligibility was too onerous.

Indeed, the state’s last rent relief program rejected many tenants and only distributed half of its $100 million allotment, largely because of confusing and strict requirements. Between 800,000 and 1.2 million households across the state are thought to be late on rent.

Leave a Reply